23 research outputs found

    Non-Recognition-of-BTH4, an Arabidopsis Mediator Subunit Homolog, Is Necessary for Development and Response to Salicylic Acid

    Full text link
    [EN] Salicylic acid (SA) signaling acts in defense and plant development. The only gene demonstrated to be required for the response to SA is Arabidopsis thaliana NON-EXPRESSER OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENE 1 (NPR1), and npr1 mutants are insensitive to SA. By focusing on the effect of analogs of SA on plant development, we identified mutants in additional genes acting in the SA response. In this work, we describe a gene necessary for the SA Non-Recognition-of-BTH4 (NRB4). Three nrb4 alleles recovered from the screen cause phenotypes similar to the wild type in the tested conditions, except for SA-related phenotypes. Plants with NRB4 null alleles express profound insensitivity to SA, even more than npr1. NRB4 null mutants are also sterile and their growth is compromised. Plants carrying weaker nrb4 alleles are also insensitive to SA, with some quantitative differences in some phenotypes, like systemic acquired resistance or pathogen growth restriction. When weak alleles are used, NPR1 and NRB4 mutations produce an additive phenotype, but we did not find evidence of a genetic interaction in F1 nor biochemical interaction in yeast or in planta. NRB4 is predicted to be a subunit of Mediator, the ortholog of MED15 in Arabidopsis. Mechanistically, NRB4 functions downstream of NPR1 to regulate the SA response.This work was supported by the "Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad" (MINECO) of Spain (Grant BIO201018896 to P.T., a Junta de Ampliacion de Estudios-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas Fellowship to J.V.C., and a Formacion del Personal Investigador-MINECO to A.D.) and "Generalitat Valenciana" of Spain (Grant ACOMP/2012/105 to P.T.). We appreciate the opinions and generous help of Jeff Dangl and Pablo Vera with the article as well as the revision of Philippa Borrill.Canet Perez, JV.; Dobón Alonso, A.; Tornero Feliciano, P. (2012). Non-Recognition-of-BTH4, an Arabidopsis Mediator Subunit Homolog, Is Necessary for Development and Response to Salicylic Acid. Plant Cell. 24(10):4220-4235. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.103028S42204235241

    The Blade-On-Petiole genes of Arabidopsis are essential for resistance induced by methyl jasmonate

    Get PDF
    Background: NPR1 is a gene of Arabidopsis thaliana required for the perception of salicylic acid. This perception triggers a defense response and negatively regulates the perception of jasmonates. Surprisingly, the application of methyl jasmonate also induces resistance, and NPR1 is also suspected to be relevant. Since an allelic series of npr1 was recently described, the behavior of these alleles was tested in response to methyl jasmonate. Results: The response to methyl jasmonate of different npr1s alleles and NPR1 paralogs null mutants was measured by the growth of a pathogen. We have also tested the subcellular localization of some npr1s, along with the protein-protein interactions that can be measured in yeast. The localization of the protein in npr1 alleles does not affect the response to methyl jasmonate. In fact, NPR1 is not required. The genes that are required in a redundant fashion are the BOPs. The BOPs are paralogs of NPR1, and they physically interact with the TGA family of transcription factors. Conclusions: Some npr1 alleles have a phenotype in this response likely because they are affecting the interaction between BOPs and TGAs, and these two families of proteins are responsible for the resistance induced by methyl jasmonate in wild type plants.This work was supported by the "Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad" (MINECO) of Spain (grant BIO201018896 to PT, a JAE-CSIC Fellowship to JVC and a FPI-MINECO to AD) and "Generalitat Valenciana" of Spain (grant ACOMP/2012/105 to PT). Thanks to Dr. Xinnian Dong for NPR1 overexpression lines and to Dr. Ove Nilsson for BOPs overexpression lines. We appreciate the opinions and generous help of Drs. Vicente Ramirez, Pablo Vera, and Shelley Hepworth about the manuscript.Dobón Alonso, A.; Fajmonova, J.; Tornero Feliciano, P.; Canet, JV. (2012). The Blade-On-Petiole genes of Arabidopsis are essential for resistance induced by methyl jasmonate. BMC Plant Biology. 199:1-1. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-199S11199Ross, A. F. (1961). Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants. Virology, 14(3), 340-358. doi:10.1016/0042-6822(61)90319-1López, M. A., Bannenberg, G., & Castresana, C. (2008). Controlling hormone signaling is a plant and pathogen challenge for growth and survival. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 11(4), 420-427. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.05.002Browse, J. (2009). Jasmonate Passes Muster: A Receptor and Targets for the Defense Hormone. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 60(1), 183-205. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092007Dong, X. (2004). NPR1, all things considered. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7(5), 547-552. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.005Zhang, Y., Cheng, Y. T., Qu, N., Zhao, Q., Bi, D., & Li, X. (2006). Negative regulation of defense responses in Arabidopsis by twoNPR1paralogs. The Plant Journal, 48(5), 647-656. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02903.xHa, C. M. (2003). The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE 1 gene controls leaf pattern formation through the modulation of meristematic activity in Arabidopsis. Development, 130(1), 161-172. doi:10.1242/dev.00196CANET, J. V., DOBÓN, A., ROIG, A., & TORNERO, P. (2010). Structure-function analysis of npr1 alleles in Arabidopsis reveals a role for its paralogs in the perception of salicylic acid. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33(11), 1911-1922. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02194.xZhang, Y., Fan, W., Kinkema, M., Li, X., & Dong, X. (1999). Interaction of NPR1 with basic leucine zipper protein transcription factors that bind sequences required for salicylic acid induction of the PR-1 gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(11), 6523-6528. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.6523Ton, J., De Vos, M., Robben, C., Buchala, A., Métraux, J.-P., Van Loon, L. C., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2002). Characterization ofArabidopsisenhanced disease susceptibility mutants that are affected in systemically induced resistance. The Plant Journal, 29(1), 11-21. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01190.xSpoel, S. H., Koornneef, A., Claessens, S. M. C., Korzelius, J. P., Van Pelt, J. A., Mueller, M. J., … Pieterse, C. M. J. (2003). NPR1 Modulates Cross-Talk between Salicylate- and Jasmonate-Dependent Defense Pathways through a Novel Function in the Cytosol. The Plant Cell, 15(3), 760-770. doi:10.1105/tpc.009159Glazebrook, J., Chen, W., Estes, B., Chang, H.-S., Nawrath, C., Metraux, J.-P., … Katagiri, F. (2003). Topology of the network integrating salicylate and jasmonate signal transduction derived from global expression phenotyping. The Plant Journal, 34(2), 217-228. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01717.xJohansson, A., Staal, J., & Dixelius, C. (2006). Early Responses in theArabidopsis-Verticillium longisporumPathosystem Are Dependent onNDR1, JA- and ET-Associated Signals via Cytosolic NPR1 andRFO1. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 19(9), 958-969. doi:10.1094/mpmi-19-0958Leon-Reyes, A., Spoel, S. H., De Lange, E. S., Abe, H., Kobayashi, M., Tsuda, S., … Pieterse, C. M. J. (2009). Ethylene Modulates the Role of NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES1 in Cross Talk between Salicylate and Jasmonate Signaling. Plant Physiology, 149(4), 1797-1809. doi:10.1104/pp.108.133926Ramírez, V., Van der Ent, S., García-Andrade, J., Coego, A., Pieterse, C. M., & Vera, P. (2010). OCP3 is an important modulator of NPR1-mediated jasmonic acid-dependent induced defenses in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biology, 10(1), 199. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-10-199Hepworth, S. R., Zhang, Y., McKim, S., Li, X., & Haughn, G. W. (2005). BLADE-ON-PETIOLE–Dependent Signaling Controls Leaf and Floral Patterning in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 17(5), 1434-1448. doi:10.1105/tpc.104.030536Ha, C. M., Jun, J. H., Nam, H. G., & Fletcher, J. C. (2004). BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 Encodes a BTB/POZ Domain Protein Required for Leaf Morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Cell Physiology, 45(10), 1361-1370. doi:10.1093/pcp/pch201Dobón, A., Canet, J. V., Perales, L., & Tornero, P. (2011). Quantitative genetic analysis of salicylic acid perception in Arabidopsis. Planta, 234(4), 671-684. doi:10.1007/s00425-011-1436-6Zhang, X., Chen, S., & Mou, Z. (2010). Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for regulation of salicylate tolerance, isochorismate synthase 1 expression and salicylate accumulation in Arabidopsis. Journal of Plant Physiology, 167(2), 144-148. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2009.08.002Cao, H., Glazebrook, J., Clarke, J. D., Volko, S., & Dong, X. (1997). The Arabidopsis NPR1 Gene That Controls Systemic Acquired Resistance Encodes a Novel Protein Containing Ankyrin Repeats. Cell, 88(1), 57-63. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81858-9Lawton, K. (1995). Systemic Acquired Resistance inArabidopsisRequires Salicylic Acid but Not Ethylene. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 8(6), 863. doi:10.1094/mpmi-8-0863Nawrath, C., Heck, S., Parinthawong, N., & Métraux, J.-P. (2002). EDS5, an Essential Component of Salicylic Acid–Dependent Signaling for Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis, Is a Member of the MATE Transporter Family. The Plant Cell, 14(1), 275-286. doi:10.1105/tpc.010376Wildermuth, M. C., Dewdney, J., Wu, G., & Ausubel, F. M. (2001). Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature, 414(6863), 562-565. doi:10.1038/35107108Schwab, R., Ossowski, S., Riester, M., Warthmann, N., & Weigel, D. (2006). Highly Specific Gene Silencing by Artificial MicroRNAs in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 18(5), 1121-1133. doi:10.1105/tpc.105.039834Norberg, M. (2005). The BLADE ON PETIOLE genes act redundantly to control the growth and development of lateral organs. Development, 132(9), 2203-2213. doi:10.1242/dev.01815Xie, D. (1998). COI1: An Arabidopsis Gene Required for Jasmonate-Regulated Defense and Fertility. Science, 280(5366), 1091-1094. doi:10.1126/science.280.5366.1091Dombrecht, B., Xue, G. P., Sprague, S. J., Kirkegaard, J. A., Ross, J. J., Reid, J. B., … Kazan, K. (2007). MYC2 Differentially Modulates Diverse Jasmonate-Dependent Functions in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 19(7), 2225-2245. doi:10.1105/tpc.106.048017He, Y., Fukushige, H., Hildebrand, D. F., & Gan, S. (2002). Evidence Supporting a Role of Jasmonic Acid in Arabidopsis Leaf Senescence. Plant Physiology, 128(3), 876-884. doi:10.1104/pp.010843Mittal, S. (1995). Role of the Phytotoxin Coronatine in the Infection ofAmbidopsis thalianabyPseudomonas syringaepv.tomato. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 8(1), 165. doi:10.1094/mpmi-8-0165Ton, J., & Mauch-Mani, B. (2004). β-amino-butyric acid-induced resistance against necrotrophic pathogens is based on ABA-dependent priming for callose. The Plant Journal, 38(1), 119-130. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02028.xChang, C., Kwok, S., Bleecker, A., & Meyerowitz, E. (1993). Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science, 262(5133), 539-544. doi:10.1126/science.8211181Jun, J. H., Ha, C. M., & Fletcher, J. C. (2010). BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 Coordinates Organ Determinacy and Axial Polarity in Arabidopsis by Directly Activating ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2. The Plant Cell, 22(1), 62-76. doi:10.1105/tpc.109.070763Zhang, Y., Tessaro, M. J., Lassner, M., & Li, X. (2003). Knockout Analysis of Arabidopsis Transcription Factors TGA2, TGA5, and TGA6 Reveals Their Redundant and Essential Roles in Systemic Acquired Resistance. The Plant Cell, 15(11), 2647-2653. doi:10.1105/tpc.014894Delaney, T. P., Friedrich, L., & Ryals, J. A. (1995). Arabidopsis signal transduction mutant defective in chemically and biologically induced disease resistance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(14), 6602-6606. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.14.6602Ha, C. M., Jun, J. H., Nam, H. G., & Fletcher, J. C. (2007). BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 and 2 Control Arabidopsis Lateral Organ Fate through Regulation of LOB Domain and Adaxial-Abaxial Polarity Genes. The Plant Cell, 19(6), 1809-1825. doi:10.1105/tpc.107.051938Xu, M., Hu, T., McKim, S. M., Murmu, J., Haughn, G. W., & Hepworth, S. R. (2010). Arabidopsis BLADE-ON-PETIOLE1 and 2 promote floral meristem fate and determinacy in a previously undefined pathway targeting APETALA1 and AGAMOUS-LIKE24. The Plant Journal, 63(6), 974-989. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04299.xMcKim, S. M., Stenvik, G.-E., Butenko, M. A., Kristiansen, W., Cho, S. K., Hepworth, S. R., … Haughn, G. W. (2008). The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes are essential for abscission zone formation in Arabidopsis. Development, 135(8), 1537-1546. doi:10.1242/dev.012807Ha, C. M., Jun, J. H., & Fletcher, J. C. (2010). Control of Arabidopsis Leaf Morphogenesis Through Regulation of the YABBY and KNOX Families of Transcription Factors. Genetics, 186(1), 197-206. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.118703Stein, E., Molitor, A., Kogel, K.-H., & Waller, F. (2008). Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis Conferred by the Mycorrhizal Fungus Piriformospora indica Requires Jasmonic Acid Signaling and the Cytoplasmic Function of NPR1. Plant and Cell Physiology, 49(11), 1747-1751. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcn147Spoel, S. H., Mou, Z., Tada, Y., Spivey, N. W., Genschik, P., & Dong, X. (2009). Proteasome-Mediated Turnover of the Transcription Coactivator NPR1 Plays Dual Roles in Regulating Plant Immunity. Cell, 137(5), 860-872. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.038Jakoby, M., Weisshaar, B., Dröge-Laser, W., Vicente-Carbajosa, J., Tiedemann, J., Kroj, T., & Parcy, F. (2002). bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends in Plant Science, 7(3), 106-111. doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(01)02223-3Alonso, J. M. (2003). Genome-Wide Insertional Mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science, 301(5633), 653-657. doi:10.1126/science.1086391Curtis, M. D., & Grossniklaus, U. (2003). A Gateway Cloning Vector Set for High-Throughput Functional Analysis of Genes in Planta. Plant Physiology, 133(2), 462-469. doi:10.1104/pp.103.027979Ciannamea, S., Kaufmann, K., Frau, M., Tonaco, I. A. N., Petersen, K., Nielsen, K. K., … Immink, R. G. H. (2006). Protein interactions of MADS box transcription factors involved in flowering in Lolium perenne. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57(13), 3419-3431. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl144Vidal, M. (1999). Yeast forward and reverse «n»-hybrid systems. Nucleic Acids Research, 27(4), 919-929. doi:10.1093/nar/27.4.919Nakagawa, T., Kurose, T., Hino, T., Tanaka, K., Kawamukai, M., Niwa, Y., … Kimura, T. (2007). Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 104(1), 34-41. doi:10.1263/jbb.104.34Clough, S. J., & Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 16(6), 735-743. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.

    Molecular analysis of menadione-induced resistance against biotic stress in Arabidopsis

    Get PDF
    19 páginas, 6 figuras, 2 tablas.Menadione sodium bisulphite (MSB) is a water-soluble derivative of vitamin K3, or menadione, and has been previously demonstrated to function as a plant defence activator against several pathogens in several plant species. However, there are no reports of the role of this vitamin in the induction of resistance in the plant model Arabidopsis thaliana. In the current study, we demonstrate that MSB induces resistance by priming in Arabidopsis against the virulent strain Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto) without inducing necrosis or visible damage. Changes in gene expression in response to 0.2 mm MSB were analysed in Arabidopsis at 3, 6 and 24 h post-treatment using microarray technology. In general, the treatment with MSB does not correlate with other publicly available data, thus MSB produces a unique molecular footprint. We observed 158 differentially regulated genes among all the possible trends. More up-regulated genes are included in categories such as 'response to stress' than the background, and the behaviour of these genes in different treatments confirms their role in response to biotic and abiotic stress. In addition, there is an over-representation of the G-box in their promoters. Some interesting functions are represented among the individual up-regulated genes, such as glutathione S-transferases, transcription factors (including putative regulators of the G-box) and cytochrome P450s. This work provides a wide insight into the molecular cues underlying the effect of MSB as a plant resistance inducer.This work was partially funded by an INVESCAN, S.L. grant (No.OTT2001438) to the CSIC and by a BIO2006-02168 grant of MICINN to PT. The microarrays were funded in part by the “Genome España” Foundation. MER was supported by a research contract (ID-TF-06/002) from the Consejería de Industria, Comercio y Nuevas Tecnologías (Gobierno de Canarias). The authors thank CajaCanarias for their research support. We also thank Lorena Perales for her help in performing the bacterial growth curves, Dr. Héctor Cabrera for his useful advice on writing the manuscript, the English translation service of the Universidad Politécnica de Valencia and Mrs. Pauline Agnew whose endeavoured to edit the English translation of this paper.Peer reviewe

    An allele of Arabidopsis COI1 with hypo- and hypermorphic phenotypes in plant growth, defence and fertility

    Get PDF
    Resistance to biotrophic pathogens is largely dependent on the hormone salicylic acid (SA) while jasmonic acid (JA) regulates resistance against necrotrophs. JA negatively regulates SA and is, in itself, negatively regulated by SA. A key component of the JA signal transduction pathway is its receptor, the COI1 gene. Mutations in this gene can affect all the JA phenotypes, whereas mutations in other genes, either in JA signal transduction or in JA biosynthesis, lack this general effect. To identify components of the part of the resistance against biotrophs independent of SA, a mutagenised population of NahG plants (severely depleted of SA) was screened for suppression of susceptibility. The screen resulted in the identification of intragenic and extragenic suppressors, and the results presented here correspond to the characterization of one extragenic suppressor, coi1-40. coi1-40 is quite different from previously described coi1 alleles, and it represents a strategy for enhancing resistance to biotrophs with low levels of SA, likely suppressing NahG by increasing the perception to the remaining SA. The phenotypes of coi1-40 lead us to speculate about a modular function for COI1, since we have recovered a mutation in COI1 which has a number of JA-related phenotypes reduced while others are equal to or above wild type levels.This work was supported by grant BIO201018896 from "Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad" (MINECO) of Spain and by grant ACOMP/2012/105 from "Generalitat Valenciana" to PT, a JAE-CSIC Fellowship to JVC, a FPI-MINECO to AD, and Fellowships from the European Molecular Biology Organization and the Human Frontier Science Program to BBHW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Dobón Alonso, A.; Wulff, BBH.; Canet Perez, JV.; Fort Rausell, P.; Tornero Feliciano, P. (2013). An allele of Arabidopsis COI1 with hypo- and hypermorphic phenotypes in plant growth, defence and fertility. PLoS ONE. 1(8):55115-55115. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055115S551155511518Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., & Klessig, D. F. (2009). Salicylic Acid, a Multifaceted Hormone to Combat Disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 47(1), 177-206. doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202Mauch, F., Mauch-Mani, B., Gaille, C., Kull, B., Haas, D., & Reimmann, C. (2001). Manipulation of salicylate content in Arabidopsis thaliana by the expression of an engineered bacterial salicylate synthase. The Plant Journal, 25(1), 67-77. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00940.xGaffney, T., Friedrich, L., Vernooij, B., Negrotto, D., Nye, G., Uknes, S., … Ryals, J. (1993). Requirement of Salicylic Acid for the Induction of Systemic Acquired Resistance. Science, 261(5122), 754-756. doi:10.1126/science.261.5122.754Delaney, T. P., Uknes, S., Vernooij, B., Friedrich, L., Weymann, K., Negrotto, D., … Ryals, J. (1994). A Central Role of Salicylic Acid in Plant Disease Resistance. Science, 266(5188), 1247-1250. doi:10.1126/science.266.5188.1247Lawton, K. (1995). Systemic Acquired Resistance inArabidopsisRequires Salicylic Acid but Not Ethylene. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 8(6), 863. doi:10.1094/mpmi-8-0863Ross, A. F. (1961). Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants. Virology, 14(3), 340-358. doi:10.1016/0042-6822(61)90319-1Pieterse, C. M. ., & van Loon, L. C. (1999). Salicylic acid-independent plant defence pathways. Trends in Plant Science, 4(2), 52-58. doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(98)01364-8Fonseca, S., Chico, J. M., & Solano, R. (2009). The jasmonate pathway: the ligand, the receptor and the core signalling module. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 12(5), 539-547. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.07.013Ton, J., De Vos, M., Robben, C., Buchala, A., Métraux, J.-P., Van Loon, L. C., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2002). Characterization ofArabidopsisenhanced disease susceptibility mutants that are affected in systemically induced resistance. The Plant Journal, 29(1), 11-21. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01190.xCui, J., Bahrami, A. K., Pringle, E. G., Hernandez-Guzman, G., Bender, C. L., Pierce, N. E., & Ausubel, F. M. (2005). Pseudomonas syringae manipulates systemic plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(5), 1791-1796. doi:10.1073/pnas.0409450102Robert-Seilaniantz, A., Navarro, L., Bari, R., & Jones, J. D. (2007). Pathological hormone imbalances. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 10(4), 372-379. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.06.003Garcion, C., Lohmann, A., Lamodière, E., Catinot, J., Buchala, A., Doermann, P., & Métraux, J.-P. (2008). Characterization and Biological Function of the ISOCHORISMATE SYNTHASE2 Gene of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 147(3), 1279-1287. doi:10.1104/pp.108.119420Tornero, P., Chao, R. A., Luthin, W. N., Goff, S. A., & Dangl, J. L. (2002). Large-Scale Structure –Function Analysis of the Arabidopsis RPM1 Disease Resistance Protein. The Plant Cell, 14(2), 435-450. doi:10.1105/tpc.010393Bowling, S. A., Guo, A., Cao, H., Gordon, A. S., Klessig, D. F., & Dong, X. (1994). A mutation in Arabidopsis that leads to constitutive expression of systemic acquired resistance. The Plant Cell, 6(12), 1845-1857. doi:10.1105/tpc.6.12.1845Bowling, S. A., Clarke, J. D., Liu, Y., Klessig, D. F., & Dong, X. (1997). The cpr5 mutant of Arabidopsis expresses both NPR1-dependent and NPR1-independent resistance. The Plant Cell, 9(9), 1573-1584. doi:10.1105/tpc.9.9.1573Yu, I. -c., Parker, J., & Bent, A. F. (1998). Gene-for-gene disease resistance without the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis dnd1 mutant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(13), 7819-7824. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.13.7819Dietrich, R. A., Delaney, T. P., Uknes, S. J., Ward, E. R., Ryals, J. A., & Dangl, J. L. (1994). Arabidopsis mutants simulating disease resistance response. Cell, 77(4), 565-577. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90218-6Rivas-San Vicente, M., & Plasencia, J. (2011). Salicylic acid beyond defence: its role in plant growth and development. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(10), 3321-3338. doi:10.1093/jxb/err031Wang, D. (2005). Induction of Protein Secretory Pathway Is Required for Systemic Acquired Resistance. Science, 308(5724), 1036-1040. doi:10.1126/science.1108791Ritter, C. (1995). TheavrRpm1Gene ofPseudomonas syringaepv.maculicolaIs Required for Virulence on Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 8(3), 444. doi:10.1094/mpmi-8-0444Debener, T., Lehnackers, H., Arnold, M., & Dangl, J. L. (1991). Identification and molecular mapping of a single Arabidopsis thaliana locus determining resistance to a phytopathogenic Pseudomonas syringae isolate. The Plant Journal, 1(3), 289-302. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1991.t01-7-00999.xGrant, M., Godiard, L., Straube, E., Ashfield, T., Lewald, J., Sattler, A., … Dangl, J. (1995). Structure of the Arabidopsis RPM1 gene enabling dual specificity disease resistance. Science, 269(5225), 843-846. doi:10.1126/science.7638602Mindrinos, M., Katagiri, F., Yu, G.-L., & Ausubel, F. M. (1994). The A. thaliana disease resistance gene RPS2 encodes a protein containing a nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeats. Cell, 78(6), 1089-1099. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90282-8Coego, A., Ramirez, V., Gil, M. J., Flors, V., Mauch-Mani, B., & Vera, P. (2005). An Arabidopsis Homeodomain Transcription Factor, OVEREXPRESSOR OF CATIONIC PEROXIDASE 3, Mediates Resistance to Infection by Necrotrophic Pathogens. The Plant Cell, 17(7), 2123-2137. doi:10.1105/tpc.105.032375Pieterse, C. M. J., van Wees, S. C. M., van Pelt, J. A., Knoester, M., Laan, R., Gerrits, H., … van Loon, L. C. (1998). A Novel Signaling Pathway Controlling Induced Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 10(9), 1571-1580. doi:10.1105/tpc.10.9.1571Berger, S., Bell, E., & Mullet, J. E. (1996). Two Methyl Jasmonate-Insensitive Mutants Show Altered Expression of AtVsp in Response to Methyl Jasmonate and Wounding. Plant Physiology, 111(2), 525-531. doi:10.1104/pp.111.2.525Attaran, E., Zeier, T. E., Griebel, T., & Zeier, J. (2009). Methyl Salicylate Production and Jasmonate Signaling Are Not Essential for Systemic Acquired Resistance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 21(3), 954-971. doi:10.1105/tpc.108.063164Yan, J., Zhang, C., Gu, M., Bai, Z., Zhang, W., Qi, T., … Xie, D. (2009). The Arabidopsis CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1 Protein Is a Jasmonate Receptor. The Plant Cell, 21(8), 2220-2236. doi:10.1105/tpc.109.065730Mittal, S. (1995). Role of the Phytotoxin Coronatine in the Infection ofAmbidopsis thalianabyPseudomonas syringaepv.tomato. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 8(1), 165. doi:10.1094/mpmi-8-0165Genoud, T., & Métraux, J.-P. (1999). Crosstalk in plant cell signaling: structure and function of the genetic network. Trends in Plant Science, 4(12), 503-507. doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01498-3Lawton, K. A., Friedrich, L., Hunt, M., Weymann, K., Delaney, T., Kessmann, H., … Ryals, J. (1996). Benzothiadiazole induces disease resistance in Arabidopsis by activation of the systemic acquired resistance signal transduction pathway. The Plant Journal, 10(1), 71-82. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.10010071.xFeys, B., Benedetti, C. E., Penfold, C. N., & Turner, J. G. (1994). Arabidopsis Mutants Selected for Resistance to the Phytotoxin Coronatine Are Male Sterile, Insensitive to Methyl Jasmonate, and Resistant to a Bacterial Pathogen. The Plant Cell, 751-759. doi:10.1105/tpc.6.5.751Sun, J., Xu, Y., Ye, S., Jiang, H., Chen, Q., Liu, F., … Li, C. (2009). Arabidopsis ASA1 Is Important for Jasmonate-Mediated Regulation of Auxin Biosynthesis and Transport during Lateral Root Formation. The Plant Cell, 21(5), 1495-1511. doi:10.1105/tpc.108.064303He, Y., Fukushige, H., Hildebrand, D. F., & Gan, S. (2002). Evidence Supporting a Role of Jasmonic Acid in Arabidopsis Leaf Senescence. Plant Physiology, 128(3), 876-884. doi:10.1104/pp.010843Shan, X., Zhang, Y., Peng, W., Wang, Z., & Xie, D. (2009). Molecular mechanism for jasmonate-induction of anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60(13), 3849-3860. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp223Yoshida, Y., Sano, R., Wada, T., Takabayashi, J., & Okada, K. (2009). Jasmonic acid control of GLABRA3 links inducible defense and trichome patterning in Arabidopsis. Development, 136(6), 1039-1048. doi:10.1242/dev.030585Borevitz, J. O., Xia, Y., Blount, J., Dixon, R. A., & Lamb, C. (2000). Activation Tagging Identifies a Conserved MYB Regulator of Phenylpropanoid Biosynthesis. The Plant Cell, 12(12), 2383-2393. doi:10.1105/tpc.12.12.2383Berger, S., Bell, E., Sadka, A., & Mullet, J. E. (1995). Arabidopsis thaliana Atvsp is homologous to soybean VspA and VspB, genes encoding vegetative storage protein acid phosphatases, and is regulated similarly by methyl jasmonate, wounding, sugars, light and phosphate. Plant Molecular Biology, 27(5), 933-942. doi:10.1007/bf00037021Feng, S., Ma, L., Wang, X., Xie, D., Dinesh-Kumar, S. P., Wei, N., & Deng, X. W. (2003). The COP9 Signalosome Interacts Physically with SCFCOI1 and Modulates Jasmonate Responses. The Plant Cell, 15(5), 1083-1094. doi:10.1105/tpc.010207Nawrath C, Métraux JP, Genoud T (2005) Chemical signals in plant resistance: salicylic acid. . In: Tuzun S, Bent E, editors. Multigenic and Induced Systemic Resistance in Plants. Dordrecht, Netherlands.: Springer US. pp. pp. 143–165.Kunkel, B. N., & Brooks, D. M. (2002). Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 5(4), 325-331. doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00275-3Truman, W., Bennett, M. H., Kubigsteltig, I., Turnbull, C., & Grant, M. (2007). Arabidopsissystemic immunity uses conserved defense signaling pathways and is mediated by jasmonates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(3), 1075-1080. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605423104Canet, J. V., Dobón, A., Ibáñez, F., Perales, L., & Tornero, P. (2010). Resistance and biomass in Arabidopsis: a new model for Salicylic Acid perception. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 8(2), 126-141. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00468.xCasimiro, I., Marchant, A., Bhalerao, R. P., Beeckman, T., Dhooge, S., Swarup, R., … Bennett, M. (2001). Auxin Transport Promotes Arabidopsis Lateral Root Initiation. The Plant Cell, 13(4), 843-852. doi:10.1105/tpc.13.4.843Celenza, J. L., Grisafi, P. L., & Fink, G. R. (1995). A pathway for lateral root formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes & Development, 9(17), 2131-2142. doi:10.1101/gad.9.17.2131Traw, M. B., & Bergelson, J. (2003). Interactive Effects of Jasmonic Acid, Salicylic Acid, and Gibberellin on Induction of Trichomes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 133(3), 1367-1375. doi:10.1104/pp.103.027086Kloek, A. P., Verbsky, M. L., Sharma, S. B., Schoelz, J. E., Vogel, J., Klessig, D. F., & Kunkel, B. N. (2001). Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae conferred by an Arabidopsis thaliana coronatine-insensitive (coi1) mutation occurs through two distinct mechanisms. The Plant Journal, 26(5), 509-522. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01050.xXie, D. (1998). COI1: An Arabidopsis Gene Required for Jasmonate-Regulated Defense and Fertility. Science, 280(5366), 1091-1094. doi:10.1126/science.280.5366.1091Ellis, C., & Turner, J. (2002). A conditionally fertile coi1 allele indicates cross-talk between plant hormone signalling pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds and young seedlings. Planta, 215(4), 549-556. doi:10.1007/s00425-002-0787-4Fernández-Arbaizar, A., Regalado, J. J., & Lorenzo, O. (2011). Isolation and Characterization of Novel Mutant Loci Suppressing the ABA Hypersensitivity of the Arabidopsis coronatine insensitive 1-16 (coi1-16) Mutant During Germination and Seedling Growth. Plant and Cell Physiology, 53(1), 53-63. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcr174He, Y., Chung, E.-H., Hubert, D. A., Tornero, P., & Dangl, J. L. (2012). Specific Missense Alleles of the Arabidopsis Jasmonic Acid Co-Receptor COI1 Regulate Innate Immune Receptor Accumulation and Function. PLoS Genetics, 8(10), e1003018. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003018Xu, L., Liu, F., Lechner, E., Genschik, P., Crosby, W. L., Ma, H., … Xie, D. (2002). The SCFCOI1 Ubiquitin-Ligase Complexes Are Required for Jasmonate Response in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 14(8), 1919-1935. doi:10.1105/tpc.003368Chini, A., Fonseca, S., Fernández, G., Adie, B., Chico, J. M., Lorenzo, O., … Solano, R. (2007). The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature, 448(7154), 666-671. doi:10.1038/nature06006Grunewald, W., Vanholme, B., Pauwels, L., Plovie, E., Inzé, D., Gheysen, G., & Goossens, A. (2009). Expression of the Arabidopsis jasmonate signalling repressor JAZ1/TIFY10A is stimulated by auxin. EMBO reports, 10(8), 923-928. doi:10.1038/embor.2009.103Cao, H., Glazebrook, J., Clarke, J. D., Volko, S., & Dong, X. (1997). The Arabidopsis NPR1 Gene That Controls Systemic Acquired Resistance Encodes a Novel Protein Containing Ankyrin Repeats. Cell, 88(1), 57-63. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81858-9Century, K. S., Holub, E. B., & Staskawicz, B. J. (1995). NDR1, a locus of Arabidopsis thaliana that is required for disease resistance to both a bacterial and a fungal pathogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(14), 6597-6601. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.14.6597Wildermuth, M. C., Dewdney, J., Wu, G., & Ausubel, F. M. (2001). Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature, 414(6863), 562-565. doi:10.1038/35107108Lu, M., Tang, X., & Zhou, J.-M. (2001). Arabidopsis NHO1 Is Required for General Resistance against Pseudomonas Bacteria. The Plant Cell, 13(2), 437-447. doi:10.1105/tpc.13.2.437Ritter, C., & Dangl, J. L. (1996). Interference between Two Specific Pathogen Recognition Events Mediated by Distinct Plant Disease Resistance Genes. The Plant Cell, 251-257. doi:10.1105/tpc.8.2.251Tornero, P., & Dangl, J. L. (2002). A high-throughput method for quantifying growth of phytopathogenic bacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 28(4), 475-481. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01136.xMacho, A. P., Guevara, C. M., Tornero, P., Ruiz-Albert, J., & Beuzón, C. R. (2010). The Pseudomonas syringae effector protein HopZ1a suppresses effector-triggered immunity. New Phytologist, 187(4), 1018-1033. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03381.xTon, J., & Mauch-Mani, B. (2004). β-amino-butyric acid-induced resistance against necrotrophic pathogens is based on ABA-dependent priming for callose. The Plant Journal, 38(1), 119-130. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02028.xCANET, J. V., DOBÓN, A., ROIG, A., & TORNERO, P. (2010). Structure-function analysis of npr1 alleles in Arabidopsis reveals a role for its paralogs in the perception of salicylic acid. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33(11), 1911-1922. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02194.xJohnson, C. M., Stout, P. R., Broyer, T. C., & Carlton, A. B. (1957). Comparative chlorine requirements of different plant species. Plant and Soil, 8(4), 337-353. doi:10.1007/bf01666323Dobón, A., Canet, J. V., Perales, L., & Tornero, P. (2011). Quantitative genetic analysis of salicylic acid perception in Arabidopsis. Planta, 234(4), 671-684. doi:10.1007/s00425-011-1436-6Mehrtens, F., Kranz, H., Bednarek, P., & Weisshaar, B. (2005). The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor MYB12 Is a Flavonol-Specific Regulator of Phenylpropanoid Biosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 138(2), 1083-1096. doi:10.1104/pp.104.058032Konieczny, A., & Ausubel, F. M. (1993). A procedure for mapping Arabidopsis mutations using co-dominant ecotype-specific PCR-based markers. The Plant Journal, 4(2), 403-410. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020403.xBell, C. J., & Ecker, J. R. (1994). Assignment of 30 Microsatellite Loci to the Linkage Map of Arabidopsis. Genomics, 19(1), 137-144. doi:10.1006/geno.1994.1023Swarbreck, D., Wilks, C., Lamesch, P., Berardini, T. Z., Garcia-Hernandez, M., Foerster, H., … Huala, E. (2007). The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Research, 36(Database), D1009-D1014. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm965Jürgens G, Mayer U, Torres Ruiz RA, Berleth T, Mísera S (1991) Genetic analysis of pattern formation in the Arabidopsis embryo. Development (Supplement 1) : 27–38.Huang, W. E., Wang, H., Zheng, H., Huang, L., Singer, A. C., Thompson, I., & Whiteley, A. S. (2005). Chromosomally located gene fusions constructed in Acinetobacter sp. ADP1 for the detection of salicylate. Environmental Microbiology, 7(9), 1339-1348. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00821.xDeFraia, C. T., Schmelz, E. A., & Mou, Z. (2008). A rapid biosensor-based method for quantification of free and glucose-conjugated salicylic acid. Plant Methods, 4(1), 28. doi:10.1186/1746-4811-4-28Chenna, R. (2003). Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(13), 3497-3500. doi:10.1093/nar/gkg50

    Novel Disease Susceptibility Factors for Fungal Necrotrophic Pathogens in Arabidopsis

    Get PDF
    Host cells use an intricate signaling system to respond to invasions by pathogenic microorganisms. Although several signaling components of disease resistance against necrotrophic fungal pathogens have been identified, our understanding for how molecular components and host processes contribute to plant disease susceptibility is rather sparse. Here, we identified four transcription factors (TFs) from Arabidopsis that limit pathogen spread. Arabidopsis mutants defective in any of these TFs displayed increased disease susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea and Plectosphaerella cucumerina, and a general activation of non-immune host processes that contribute to plant disease susceptibility. Transcriptome analyses revealed that the mutants share a common transcriptional signature of 77 up-regulated genes. We characterized several of the up-regulated genes that encode peptides with a secretion signal, which we named PROVIR (for provirulence) factors. Forward and reverse genetic analyses revealed that many of the PROVIRs are important for disease susceptibility of the host to fungal necrotrophs. The TFs and PROVIRs identified in our work thus represent novel genetic determinants for plant disease susceptibility to necrotrophic fungal pathogens.Funding: This work was supported by the Spanish MINECO (BFU2012 to PV), and Generalitat Valenciana (Prometeo2014/020 to PV). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Dobón Alonso, A.; Canet Perez, JV.; García-Andrade Serrano, J.; Angulo, C.; Neumetzler, L.; Persson, S.; Vera Vera, P. (2015). Novel Disease Susceptibility Factors for Fungal Necrotrophic Pathogens in Arabidopsis. PLoS Pathogens. 11(4):1-30. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004800S13011

    Interacción de LRA5 con genes asociados a defensa en Arabidopsis

    Get PDF
    Tesis doctoral del Departamento de Biotecnología de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, realizada en el Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de PlantasLa interacción planta‐patógeno es una de las relaciones más interesantes que se pueden establecer entre las plantas y los organismos que las rodean. El estudio de mutantes afectados en respuestas de defensa constituye una importante fuente de información acerca de los mecanimos que la componen. LRA5 fue descrito previamente como un mutante de Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) afectado en varios tipos de resistencia y que presenta niveles anormalmente bajos de ácido salicílico (SA), hormona relacionada con la resistencia a patógenos biotrofos. Se ha intentado cartografiar su posición en el genoma de Arabidopsis, reduciendo el intervalo de mapeo a tres únicos genes en los que no se ha encontrado alteración en la secuencia ni en la expresón que pudiera explicar el fenotipo de LRA5, descubriendo finalmente que se trata de un transgén NahG (que codifica para una enzima salicilato hidroxilasa) de origen desconocidoPara poder caracterizar componentes de la resistencia a biotrofos independientes de la hormona SA, se ha realizado un rastreo de supresores de LRA5 que restauraran, al menos parcialmente, la resistencia frente a Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pto). La mayor parte del trabajo se ha centrado en la caracterización de dos mutantes extragénicos, escogidos por su carácter opuesto. esh1 (de EDWARD SCISSOR HANDS 1) posee un peculiar fenotipo de hojas abigarradas y de silicuas agrupadas en los extremos de las inflorescencias, dependiente del número de días pasados en día corto. Es además capaz de suprimir la susceptibilidad a Pto y a otros patógenos, y expresa de manera constitutiva PR1. Por otro lado, jrc1 (de JAROCKS 1) solo restaura la resistencia a Pto y expresa PR1 de manera exacerbada tras la infección con patógeno. Además presenta fenotipos de insensibilidad al ácido jasmónico (JA).Es especialmente llamativo el fenotipo de raíces laterales, cuyo número excede con mucho los niveles de coi1‐1 y jin1, otros mutantes en la señalización por JA. Finalmente, el cartografiado ha permitido descubrir que jrc1 es un alelo de COI1 no nulo. COI1 es un gen crucial en las repuestas basadas en la hormona JA, explicando la supresión de NahG por la regulación negativa existente entre SA y JA.Peer reviewe

    Quantitative genetic analysis of salicylic acid perception in Arabidopsis

    Get PDF
    Salicylic acid (SA) is a phytohormone required for a full resistance against some pathogens in Arabidopsis, and NPR1 (Non-Expressor of Pathogenesis Related Genes 1) is the only gene with a strong effect on resistance induced by SA which has been described. There can be additional components of SA perception that escape the traditional approach of mutagenesis. An alternative to that approach is searching in the natural variation of Arabidopsis. Different methods of analyzing the variation between ecotypes have been tried and it has been found that measuring the growth of a virulent isolate of Pseudomonas syringae after the exogenous application of SA is the most effective one. Two ecotypes, Edi-0 and Stw-0, have been crossed, and their F2 has been studied. There are two significant Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) in this population, and there is one QTL in each one of the existing mapping populations Col-4 x Laer-0 and Laer-0 x No-0. They have different characteristics: while one QTL is only detectable at low concentrations of SA, the other acts after the point of crosstalk with methyl jasmonate signalling. Three of the QTLs have candidates described in SA perception as NPR1, its interactors, and a calmodulin binding protein.This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN) of Spain (grant BIO201018896 to PT, a JAE-CSIC Fellowship to JVC and a FPI-MICINN to AD). We appreciate the BTH provided by Syngenta and the genotyping by CEGEN (Fundación Genoma España). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.Peer reviewe

    Resistance and biomass in Arabidopsis: a new model for Salicylic acid perception.

    Get PDF
    Salicylic acid (SA) is an essential hormone for plant defence and development SA perception is usually measured by counting the number of pathogens that grow in planta upon an exogenous application of the hormone. A biological SA perception model based on plant fresh weight reduction caused by disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana is proposed This effect is more noticeable when a chemical analogue of SA is used, like Benzothiadiazole (BTH) By spraying BTH several times, a Substantial difference in plant biomass is observed when compared with the mock treatment Such difference is dose-dependent and does not require pathogen inoculation The model is robust and allows for the comparison of different Arabidopsis ecotypes, recombinant inbreed lines, and mutants Our results show that two mutants, non-expresser of pathogenesis-related genes 1 (npr1) and auxin resistant 3 (axr3), fail to lose biomass when BTH is applied to them Further experiments show that axr3 responds to SA and BTH in terms of defence induction. NPR1-related genotypes also confirm the pivotal role of NPR1 in SA perception, and suggest an active program of depletion of resources in the infected tissuesMinisteno de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) BIO2006-02168 JAE-CSIC Fellowship FPI-MICINNPeer reviewe

    Non-Recognition-of-BTH4

    No full text

    Molecular analysis of menadione-induced resistance against biotic stress in Arabidopsis

    Get PDF
    19 páginas, 6 figuras, 2 tablas.Menadione sodium bisulphite (MSB) is a water-soluble derivative of vitamin K3, or menadione, and has been previously demonstrated to function as a plant defence activator against several pathogens in several plant species. However, there are no reports of the role of this vitamin in the induction of resistance in the plant model Arabidopsis thaliana. In the current study, we demonstrate that MSB induces resistance by priming in Arabidopsis against the virulent strain Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto) without inducing necrosis or visible damage. Changes in gene expression in response to 0.2 mm MSB were analysed in Arabidopsis at 3, 6 and 24 h post-treatment using microarray technology. In general, the treatment with MSB does not correlate with other publicly available data, thus MSB produces a unique molecular footprint. We observed 158 differentially regulated genes among all the possible trends. More up-regulated genes are included in categories such as 'response to stress' than the background, and the behaviour of these genes in different treatments confirms their role in response to biotic and abiotic stress. In addition, there is an over-representation of the G-box in their promoters. Some interesting functions are represented among the individual up-regulated genes, such as glutathione S-transferases, transcription factors (including putative regulators of the G-box) and cytochrome P450s. This work provides a wide insight into the molecular cues underlying the effect of MSB as a plant resistance inducer.This work was partially funded by an INVESCAN, S.L. grant (No.OTT2001438) to the CSIC and by a BIO2006-02168 grant of MICINN to PT. The microarrays were funded in part by the “Genome España” Foundation. MER was supported by a research contract (ID-TF-06/002) from the Consejería de Industria, Comercio y Nuevas Tecnologías (Gobierno de Canarias). The authors thank CajaCanarias for their research support. We also thank Lorena Perales for her help in performing the bacterial growth curves, Dr. Héctor Cabrera for his useful advice on writing the manuscript, the English translation service of the Universidad Politécnica de Valencia and Mrs. Pauline Agnew whose endeavoured to edit the English translation of this paper.Peer reviewe
    corecore